Sunday, July 5, 2015

Brevity is a Virtue

“I do.”

“Come home. She’s gone.”

“So help me God.”

These brief passages served as micronarratives—snapshots—of some of the most profound moments in my life. Without knowing me, a reader could likely surmise the gist of the events behind these words: my wedding, a death in the family and my oath of office.

“Express your most powerful thought in the shortest sentence,” Roy Peter Clark said in his article “The Short Sentence as Gospel Truth.”

This advice validates something that I had intuitively accepted as true: brevity is a virtue. I agree that short sentences can conjure imagery as powerful as a photograph. Clark outlined instances that offer proof of concept. For example, placing “[h]is was 00001” in a paragraph’s last sentence recasts the idea of Herman the chimpanzee’s longevity at his zoo.

I think that something even shorter—like a name or a single word—can create a reader reaction as intense as Jeremy’s lede example. Harkening back to a lesson from Professor Nagy’s Ancient Greek Heroes course (I highly recommend it), a name or a single word can serve as a signpost pointing to something larger.

Here’s an example:

Jar Jar Binks.

For Star Wars fans, this name likely evoked a visceral reaction. For me, it summed up all that was wrong with the Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace—a forced Campbellian trope, ill-conceived comic relief and annoying protagonists.

In his 1999 review of the film, Director and Massachusetts native Eli Roth expressed his most powerful thought in the shortest sentence when he said, “It sucks.”

Friday, July 3, 2015

Quotes and Subject Matter in the Washington Post

I came across an interesting quote situation while reading Justin Moyer's article on Bo Dukes response to the removal of "The Dukes of Hazard" from TV Land. Moyer quotes a fellow cast member's Facebook post, which was written in all caps. He quotes the post verbatim, in all caps, noting that is how it originally appeared within the text of the article. I agree with this decision, as the decision to type in all caps communicates a certain tone that the speaker (writer?) likely intended. However I wonder if this is too much of an assumption to make - how would a reader know if this is someone who always types in all caps or if this was specific emphasis made for this particular post on this topic? I would guess it is the journalists responsibility to contact the person who posted the statement in question and give them the opportunity to speak for themselves, but this does not seem like the logistically realistic option, especially for breaking news stories. 

On an entirely different note, I have been surprised by some of the articles various news sources are releasing about the Supreme Court ruling for same-sex marriage. For example, in today's Washington Post, there is an opinion piece that questions the use of gay pride symbolism by non-gay individuals who support the decision, but perhaps did not involve themselves in the struggle for rights as deeply as those who the issue directly effected. Last week the New York Times ran an article describing the loss of an oppressed identity that is confusing and saddening to several gay individuals. These stories both struck me as not entirely news-worthy and odd choices of perspectives to focus on in an incredibly positive moment.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/02/bo-duke-tweets-photo-of-dylann-roof-in-protest-after-tv-land-dumps-dukes-of-hazzard/?tid=pm_pop_b

http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/07/02/why-you-should-stop-waving-the-rainbow-flag-on-facebook/?tid=pm_pop_b

Coping While Black: A Season of Traumatic News Takes A Psychological Toll

I read an amazing article this morning on NPR.ORG today, regarding racism and how it can have a psychological effect on Black-Americans.

Although I think stress and psychological trauma stemming from racial incidents amongst the black community is subjective, I definitely can see how it can have a traumatic effect on people.

I can only imagine what it’s like for African-Americans who have dealt with racial incidents in the past, or have to deal with racial attacks everyday while witnessing what is happening in society right now.

I have never dealt with racially charged attacks turning violent. However, I have dealt with ignorant remarks being made towards me, in relation to my ethnicity. It is not a good feeling. I can only imagine what it's like for other people who have dealt with consistent racial prejudice's throughout their lives.

I handle it a little differently. I’ve never cried, felt like not going to school, decided to be absent from work, or became depressed because of racial attacks or judgmental behavior. When it comes to personality, I have a very strong exterior. I usually look at people like they are stupid (Because they are). However, it still hurts inside but I usually get over it within minutes.

I am the type of person who doesn't want other people to see me sweat, but I am still human.

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/07/02/419462959/coping-while-black-a-season-of-traumatic-news-takes-a-psychological-toll






RE: "Shattered Glass"

I enjoyed reading Buzz Bissinger's September 1998 "Shattered Glass" piece in Vanity Fair. Thoroughly. I consider it a classic on how to do a profile. 

The piece told the story of Stephen Glass's fall as a journalist due to his undermining of journalistic truth with his fabrications. It positioned the story within a wider perspective of a reporter-editor relationship and trust as well as within a broader narrative and trajectory of Glass's development, family, education, socio-economic background and influence, and career ambition built on a vulnerable foundation of self-doubt and obsessive proclivity to please everyone, especially persons of authority.

The article kept me reading all of its seventy-five-hundred-plus words, wanting to know more every step of its gradual revelation. It's like peeling an onion and gradually revealing more details.

See Buzz Bissinger, Shattered Glass

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Objectivity

Objectivity in the media is an important topic, but it feels intangible in a way. No person is perfectly objective, yet we rely on the news media to be. This sets up a dilemma for journalists. Interestingly, when I think about objectivity, I think about Ayn Rand. Many dispute her for being heartless and almost in-human in her beliefs, but in fairness she believed in total and complete objectivity. For her, this meant that those who contribute most to society should keep all of their talents and riches to themselves, as it was not their responsibility to share or help, nor would it be rational to be so charitable. She would let society collapse for the benefit of the intelligent and wealthy.

I do not believe that this degree of objectivity has any place in the news. I think that to be completely objective about tragedy, especially, is out of place. Being human means that we are called to be sympathetic to victims, kind to innocents and children, etc. Humanity is not objective.


Obviously, however, in the treatment of social and political issues, it is important to remain impartial so as not to influence others, unless you are transparent about your background and intentions.

Breaking news

By Cristin Nelson

Breaking news about a new drug approval from the FDA was released this morning, and I examined it in light of our in-class breaking news exercise yesterday.

This news is prominently featured in the Globe because Vertex is a local company, and because of the news' potential impact on the lives of many people who are generally seen as a sympathetic population.  The approval also sets a precedent, given that the drug is the first of its kind.

The lede got right to the point and summed up the situation well.  The nut graf did a fine job of not only explaining some of the technical aspects, but also of explaining why we should care.

The writer runs a real risk of reader boredom if he clumps too many numbers or complicated biotech regulatory information together.  He solves this problem by introducing a human element right after the nut graf: the mother of a 16-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis.  This serves to break up the information, but is also a good human-interest piece of the story.  It is the only quote in the article, and the story never comes back to these people.

Except for the quote, and for a quick check-in on today's Vertex stock price, it is clear that all of the information came from previous news and press releases.  Very little of the information is attributed, making me think it came from previous Globe reports.  The attributions that are given are vague: "Analysts have estimated"; "Scientists have discovered"; "An FDA staff report."  I imagine that the newsroom is working on more detailed follow-ups.

It was also interesting to read the article while keeping in mind our readings about bias.  The article gave me the distinct impression that the writer thought the approval was a good thing.  Other than the cost of the drug, there are no downsides presented here.  The mother's quote is adamantly enthusiastic.

One word choice also created the impression of bias.  The writer called the approval "long-awaited," making me wonder--long-awaited by whom?  Presumably by the company, but the placement and context does give me the impression of an implication that the public at large has been waiting.

MJ LEE OF CNNPOLITICS.COM GETS IT RIGHT: Macy’s dumps Donald Trump

MJ Lee, journalist for CNNPolitics.com posted an article on Wednesday at 6:35pm confirming Donald Trump has been dropped from Macy’s

MJ Lee is one of many journalists confirming the news, after controversy about Donald Trump’s racially charged comments on the Mexican-American Community.

I thought the article was a very well written piece and extremely informative. MJ also gave readers insight on Donald Trump's merchandise within the department store, which could be something that CNNPolitics overall readers may not know much about.

MJ also included quotes from other politicians and public figures. These quotes pertained to Donald Trump's controversial remarks and Macy's terminating their partnership with the Donald and his brand. These quotes could potentially be detrimental, since Donald Trump is currently running for presidency.

I really enjoyed the article. I thought it provided current updates, but also reviewed past news about the scandal in case readers were unfamiliar.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/01/politics/donald-trump-macys/